Knowledge Centre - Office of Public Procurement Policy.

Knowledge Centre

PPC Digest

The procuring entity has not adhered to prescribed procedural requirements
- Articles coming soon
The procuring entity’s justification for use of a method of procurement other than Open Bidding cannot be supported
- Articles coming soon
The procuring entity has published ambiguous procurement requirements
- Articles coming soon
The procuring entity has included criteria that are discriminatory or otherwise objectively unjustifiable
- Articles coming soon
The procuring entity has failed to disclose any or all criteria for evaluation of bids resulting in material unfairness to bidders
- Articles coming soon
The procuring entity has rejected a responsive bid which if not rejected would affect the relative ranking of bidders
- Articles coming soon
The procuring entity has accepted a non-responsive bid which should have been rejected
- Articles coming soon
The procuring entity has not faithfully applied the criteria for evaluation set out in the bidding documents such that the relative ranking of bidders would change
- Articles coming soon
The recommended bidder is ineligible, disqualified or excluded in accordance with applicable law
- Articles coming soon
Reasons for Non-Approval
- Articles coming soon
Category A
- Articles coming soon
Category B
- Articles coming soon
Other
- Articles coming soon
Reasons for Conditional Approval
- Articles coming soon

PPC Digest

The procuring entity has not adhered to prescribed procedural requirements

The procuring entity’s justification for use of a method of procurement other than Open Bidding cannot be supported

The procuring entity has published ambiguous procurement requirements

The procuring entity has included criteria that are discriminatory or otherwise objectively unjustifiable

The procuring entity has failed to disclose any or all criteria for evaluation of bids resulting in material unfairness to bidders

The procuring entity has rejected a responsive bid which if not rejected would affect the relative ranking of bidders

The procuring entity has accepted a non-responsive bid which should have been rejected

The procuring entity has not faithfully applied the criteria for evaluation set out in the bidding documents such that the relative ranking of bidders would change

The recommended bidder is ineligible, disqualified or excluded in accordance with applicable law

Reasons for Non-Approval

Category A

Category B

Other

Reasons for Conditional Approval

Procurement Policy Implementation

Approval of Contract Award

Award of Contract

Bid Security

Bid Submission

Bid Validity

Bidding Document

Cancellation of Procurement

Code of Conduct

Commission

Conflict of Interest

Contract Administration

Contract Approval

Cost overruns

eGov

Eligibility requirements

Emergency procurement

e-Procurement

Evaluation

Exclusions

Exempt goods, works or services

Exempt public bodies

External Auditors

Framework agreement

General

Government to Government

Guidance Note

Insurance

International competitive bidding

Joint Venture

Modification or withdrawal of pre-qualification application of bid

National competitive bidding

National development project

Negotiation

Non – PPII

Performance security

Policy Interpretation

PPC Registration

Pre-qualification

Procurement committee

Procurement contract

Procurement contract approval limit

Procurement method

Procurement method threshold

Procurement of External Auditing Services

Procurement plan

Procurement Review Board

Procurement Under Alternate Systems

Public private partnership

Qualification of bidders

Reconsideration and Review

Reporting

Responsiveness of bids

Restricted bidding

Retendering

Roles and Duties – Procurement Stakeholders

Sector Committee

Single-source procurement

Special and differential treatment measures

Standard bidding document

Standstill

Supplier engagement

Surcharge

The regulations

Timeline for Notification of Procurement Opportunities